ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
What has been studied about transoral robotic surgery? Bibliometric analysis of scientific progress in Latin America and the world.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) represents a transformative minimally invasive technology offering superior visualization, precision, and safety in head and neck oncological procedures. Despite exponential global research growth, significant geographic disparities exist, with Latin America contributing only 6% of publications, reflecting technological and resource gaps. To establish the scientific progress of transoral robotic surgery in Latin America and the world. Bibliometric cross-sectional study using Scopus as the data source. Globally, 1335 scientific documents were identified, while only 29 were identified in Latin America. Scientific production has been composed essentially of original articles, followed by reviews. The first publication was made in 2005. The United States (n = 746) and Brazil (n = 20) lead the production at the global level and in Latin America, respectively. In both contexts, over time, treatment outcomes, oropharyngeal neoplasms, squamous cell carcinoma, laryngeal neoplasms and clinical follow-up have been the most frequent topics related to transoral robotic surgery. Research in transoral robotic surgery has had gradual growth. The production of primary data has predominated, with the United States being the most prolific country with the highest impact research. Both in Latin America and in the world, transoral robotic surgery has been closely related to oncologic surgery, outcome evaluation, and clinical follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41706341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.