ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Understanding the role of technical advisors in the adoption of reproductive technologies in small-scale dairy systems.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Productive, nutritional, and economic factors associated with the Lactating Cow Feed Cost-to-Milk Revenue Ratio in small-scale dairy farms.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study examined technical advisors’ perceptions of reproductive technology adoption in small-scale dairy farms in Mexico as well as the factors influencing their views. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 98 advisors participating in a national program coordinated by the Mexican Ministry of Agriculture. Of these advisors, 52 met the inclusion criteria of working with family-owned dairy farms, supporting a combined total of 1,579 farms and 22,742 lactating cows. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test (P < 0.05). Significant associations were detected between advisors’ characteristics and their views on reproductive technology implementation. Advisors who preferred reproduction as their main focus more frequently implemented and positively assessed the ease of using ultrasound-based pregnancy diagnosis (P < 0.05). Those advising more farms also reported greater ultrasound use (P = 0.040) and perceived estrus synchronization hormones (P = 0.007), ovulation protocols (P = 0.005), and estrus detection tools (P = 0.041) as easier to implement. Advisors’ years of experience influenced the perceived ease of implementing ovulation synchronization protocols (P = 0.045), and their year of graduation was linked to the perceived usefulness of sexed semen (P = 0.039). These findings highlight the importance of aligning training and extension strategies with advisors’ experience and focus areas to improve the adoption of reproductive technologies and contribute to the sustainability of small-scale dairy farming systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41706331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.