SynthesisClinical oral investigations2026
Probiotic supplementation and dental caries prevention in children and adolescents: a systematic review of strain-specific and context-dependent effects.
Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis systematic review evaluates whether probiotic supplementation may provide adjunctive, strain-specific benefits in the prevention and modulation of dental caries outcomes in children and adolescents. The primary outcomes analyzed included caries incidence, lesion progression or regression (ICDAS, dmfs/DMFS), and microbiological parameters such as Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus counts. MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive literature search was performed following PRISMA 2020 guidelines across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. Randomized controlled trials comparing probiotic interventions with placebo or standard care were included. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials. Due to considerable clinical and methodological heterogeneity among studies particularly in probiotic strain, dosage, delivery vehicle, and outcome measurement a narrative synthesis was undertaken in accordance with JBI guidance.
resultsTwelve randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Probiotic supplementation, particularly with Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1 and L. paracasei SD1 administered via milk or tablets for 6-10 months, significantly reduced caries incidence and S. mutans counts compared with control groups. Evidence regarding the prevention of caries recurrence (secondary prevention) and the regression of white spot lesions in orthodontic patients was limited and inconsistent. The overall certainty of evidence, assessed using GRADE/ConQual, was moderate for primary prevention and low for secondary outcomes.
conclusionsProbiotic supplementation may provide modest, strain-specific adjunctive benefits for caries prevention in high-risk pediatric populations; however, the certainty of evidence remains moderate to low, and findings are inconsistent across strains, delivery vehicles, and outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings support the biological plausibility of probiotics in caries management and suggest a potential adjunctive role within preventive dentistry strategies, particularly in selected high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41706206What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.