ReviewCurrent microbiology2026
Refining the Study of Endophytic Fungi: Best Practices in Antibacterial Research.
Review in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As multidrug-resistant bacteria continue to emerge rapidly, the demand for bioactive molecules with alternative mechanisms of action become increasingly urgent to address this global health crisis. Endophytic fungi (EFs) have emerged as promising sources of antimicrobial metabolites due to their remarkable biosynthetic potential. However, research on EF-derived antimicrobials often faces significant methodological limitations, including inadequate strain characterization, suboptimal bioassay design, limited quantitative validation, and insufficient chemical characterization of active compounds. These shortcomings hinder the translation of laboratory findings into clinically relevant solutions. This review provides a critical assessment of the current state of antimicrobial research involving EFs, highlights persistent methodological gaps, and advocates for the adoption of integrative and standardized approaches. In contrast to previous reviews, this work introduces a methodological framework that prioritizes reproducibility, cross-comparison of antimicrobial efficacy against bacterial targets, and the alignment of bioassay practices with clinical relevance. We argue that enhancing methodological rigor in endophytic fungal research is crucial to fully realizing their potential as a sustainable source of novel antimicrobial agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41706171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.