ArticlePediatric radiology2026
Contextual dimensions of pediatric tuberculosis imaging: radiation exposure, access, and system capacity in high- and low-resource settings.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPediatric tuberculosis diagnosis relies heavily on imaging, yet access, equipment standards, and dose monitoring differ widely across health systems. Evidence describing how these contextual factors influence imaging use and radiation exposure in children remains scarce.
objectiveTo describe pediatric tuberculosis imaging practices and estimated radiation doses across two distinct resource settings, Spain (hospital-based, high-resource) and Mozambique (primary care-based, low-resource), to inform strategies for safe, equitable, and context-appropriate imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A descriptive mixed-methods study combined retrospective data of children (<16 years) diagnosed with tuberculosis (Spain 2015-2021; Mozambique 2018-2021) with complementary surveys of imaging providers. In Spain, chest X-ray and computed tomography parameters were extracted from digital imaging and communications in medicine files to estimate organ-specific doses using the National Cancer Institute dosimetry systems for radiography and computed tomography. In Mozambique, dose estimates were based on standardized pediatric protocols and site survey parameters due to limited digital data. Surveys captured information on imaging access, guideline use, and professional training.
resultsImaging data were available for 84 Spanish and 83 Mozambican children. In Spain, children underwent multiple chest X-rays (mean four per child) and computed tomographies (mean three per child), resulting in cumulative lung doses up to ~20 mGy cm
conclusionContext-appropriate improvements in pediatric imaging such as strengthened infrastructure, training, dose monitoring, and quality assurance are essential to ensure safe exposure and equitable, reliable tuberculosis diagnosis for children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.