ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Persistence of bloodstains on domestic surfaces treated with detergents: experimental evaluation using Combur Test
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification of latent blood traces on cleaned surfaces represents a crucial challenge in forensic practice, especially in cases of intentional removal attempts by the perpetrator. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Combur Test® strips, based on the peroxidase activity of hemoglobin, in detecting residual blood traces on nine types of domestic surfaces subjected to cleaning with five different detergents, applied either immediately or after 48 h from deposition. Ninety samples were analyzed, classifying reactivity on a semi-quantitative scale (0–3) and subjecting the data to statistical analysis. Surface type proved to be the main discriminating factor (ANOVA p < 0.001): cardboard, synthetic leather, and cotton retained higher mean reactivity values (2.70–2.80), whereas plastic, stainless steel, and PVC showed lower values (1.3–1.5). Cleaning timing significantly influenced results (t-test p = 0.013), with a reduction of mean reactivity in samples treated after 48 h (1.98) compared to those cleaned immediately (2.40), suggesting that progressive dispersion and more difficult rehydration of residues reduce test sensitivity as the time interval increases. In contrast, detergent type did not produce statistically significant differences (p = 0.251). Overall, strong reactions accounted for 43% of observations, while absence of reactivity was rare (1%). In conclusion, Combur Test® is confirmed as a rapid and cost-effective method for preliminary screening of latent blood traces. However, its sensitivity is influenced by both substrate nature and timing of the crime scene investigation, highlighting the need for prompt intervention and integration with confirmatory tests in cases of smooth surfaces, recent cleaning, or delayed sampling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.