ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2026
Safely limiting the use of antibiotic prophylaxis and invasive testing in asymptomatic children with antenatally detected hydronephrosis.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntenatal hydronephrosis (HN) is the most common congenital urinary tract abnormality, but management is controversial. Current guidelines recommend continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP), voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), and diuretic renal scintigraphy (DRS) for high-grade HN, yet these measures may expose many asymptomatic infants to unnecessary antibiotics, radiation, and anesthesia. We evaluated whether a selective approach-reserving CAP for hydroureteronephrosis (HUN), limiting VCUG to HUN or confirmed urinary tract infection (UTI), and using DRS only when ultrasound trends were equivocal-could reduce interventions without increasing adverse outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,008 consecutive infants (< 24 months) with isolated HN or HUN (2015 and 2025). Patients were grouped by treatment era: 2015-2018 (pre-protocol), 2019-2021 (implementation), and 2022-2025 (post-clinic). Outcomes included use and duration of CAP, VCUG, and DRS, UTI incidence, and timing of surgery.
resultsVCUG (52% → 28%) and DRS (58% → 30%) use declined significantly over time. Median CAP duration decreased from 7.7 to 2.9 months (p < 0.001). Surveillance UTI rates remained stable (2-4%, p = 0.74). In isolated HN, CAP conferred no measurable benefit (number needed to treat [NNT] 100), whereas in HUN, CAP reduced infections (6% vs. 21%; NNT 27).
conclusionsSelective management of antenatal HN-avoiding routine CAP, VCUG, and DRS in most infants-safely reduces unnecessary interventions without increasing UTI risk or delaying surgery. CAP should be reserved for higher-risk groups, such as infants with HUN, particularly uncircumcised males. These findings support updating international guidelines toward risk-based, individualized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41706129What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.