ArticleThe oncologist2026
Empathy, access, and delays: determinants of oncology care satisfaction in Polish academic and nonacademic hospitals.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient satisfaction is a critical measure of healthcare quality, particularly in oncology, where treatment outcomes are deeply intertwined with patients' emotional and psychological experiences. This study assessed satisfaction levels among oncology patients treated in academic and nonacademic hospitals in Poland, identifying key determinants of satisfaction and disparities between these settings. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of 546 oncology patients using a structured survey that assessed demographic, clinical, and experiential variables. Comparative and regression analyses evaluated the impact of factors such as staff empathy, specialist accessibility, and treatment delays on satisfaction. Subgroup analyses explored demographic differences, including age and gender, and their influence on patient experiences.
resultsPatients treated in academic hospitals reported significantly higher satisfaction compared to those in nonacademic settings (P < .05). Key predictors of satisfaction included respect and empathy (coefficient = 0.338, P < .001), access to specialists (coefficient = 0.170, P < 0.001), and shorter treatment delays (coefficient = -0.426, P < .001). Younger patients and women exhibited greater emotional distress and financial concerns, with the <30-year age group reporting the highest financial fear (61.5%). Treatment delays in nonacademic hospitals were associated with a 42.6% reduction in the likelihood of satisfaction per additional month (P < .001).
conclusionsThis study highlights the systemic and demographic disparities in oncology care satisfaction in Poland, with academic hospitals demonstrating superior outcomes. Addressing treatment delays, enhancing access to specialists, and prioritizing empathy in patient interactions are critical to improving satisfaction. Targeted support for younger patients and women, including psychological and financial interventions, is urgently needed to mitigate the disproportionate burden they face. These findings provide actionable insights to bridge gaps in oncology care quality and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.