ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026
Individualised niches: an integrative conceptual framework across behaviour, ecology, and evolution.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low heritability and high phenotypic plasticity of salivary cortisol in response to environmental heterogeneity in a wild pinniped.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals differ. While seemingly trivial, this insight has nevertheless led to paradigm shifts, as three key fields of organismal biology have seen marked changes in key concepts over the past few decades. In animal behaviour, it has become increasingly recognised that behavioural differences among individuals can be stable over time and across contexts, giving rise to the concept of animal personalities. In ecology, attention has similarly shifted towards variation in the ecological niches occupied by species, populations and individuals, giving rise to the concept of niche specialisation or individual niche variation. In evolutionary biology, where individual variation has always been central, there is a growing awareness of the complex and dynamic ways in which individuals interact with the environment to produce unique phenotypes. Additionally, recent theoretical and empirical research suggests that fitness landscapes are not only complex, with multiple fitness peaks, but might even be more accurately described as constantly shifting 'fitness seascapes', where the fitness peak that an individual can reach - whether local or global - depends on its genotype and its interaction with the environment. Moreover, the previous distinction between ecological and evolutionary timescales is being replaced by a more integrative view that recognises that evolution can occur on ecological timeframes. These shifting perspectives over the past two decades underscore the need for a more integrated conceptual framework that transcends disciplines. While in behaviour, ecology and evolution, the concept of individualisation has contributed to major scientific progress, sufficient cross-fertilisation is still lacking. Here, we propose a new conceptual unification: the individualised niche. By merging the niche concept with the fitness concept, new explanatory power for both ecological and evolutionary processes emerges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.