Observational studyTurkish journal of ophthalmology2026
Detection of Occult Retinal Breaks Using Subretinal Dye in Recurrent Retinal Detachment Surgery.
Observational study in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the results and effectiveness of the intraoperative subretinal dual dye-assisted technique in patients treated in our clinic for recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), where small hidden retinal tears could not be detected before or during surgery. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study included 11 patients who underwent surgery in our clinic for recurrent RRD and in whom no retinal tears were detected during either preoperative or intraoperative examinations. Data from patients who underwent surgery using the modified subretinal MembraneBlue-Dual Results: In 38.4% of patients, retinal tears were located at the posterior edge of a previous laser retinopexy scar. Dye leakage was seen from the edge of a previously lasered retinal tear in 30.7% and from a new tear in 30.7%. At 1-year follow-up, anatomical success and permanent retinal reattachment were achieved in all of the patients. At postoperative 1 year, best corrected visual acuity had increased from 2.0±0.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to 0.7±0.1 logMAR. Conclusion: Occult small retinal tears that are undetectable in recurrent RRD can be successfully identified using the subretinal dye-assisted technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.