ReviewTurkish journal of ophthalmology2026
Sustainable Ophthalmology Applications: From the Perspective of Strabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology.
Review in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ophthalmology significantly contributes to the healthcare sector's carbon footprint. Despite recent increases in sustainability research in ophthalmology, there remains limited information on initiatives specific to pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus. This review aims to examine the existing literature and provide insights into sustainability and reducing carbon footprints in these areas. Although there has been no specific assessment of carbon emissions associated with congenital and developmental cataracts, measures related to cataract surgery and operating room practices remain relevant. Strabismus surgeries can be considered environmentally friendly, affordable, and energy-efficient procedures. Involving non-ophthalmologist personnel, expanding telemedicine applications, and restructuring outpatient services could reduce clinic congestion, lower costs, and improve sustainability. Some amblyopia examinations requiring long-term follow-up could be performed at local healthcare centers. While compliance and effectiveness are primary concerns in patching treatment, it is crucial to acknowledge that the patches generate significant waste and carbon footprints. Therefore, exploring alternative solutions is essential. Anesthesia poses an additional challenge for pediatric examinations, and various strategies have been suggested to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Additionally, artificial intelligence is promising and its integration into pediatric ophthalmic examinations could further enhance sustainability. In brief, although pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus are considered environmentally friendly subspecialties of ophthalmology, especially in the operating room, there are many steps that can be taken for "sustainable ophthalmology," from anesthesia to amblyopia treatment and outpatient clinic services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.