Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41705836›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2026

Breaking Lock-ins to Enable a Green Pharmacy.

Anna Shalin, Miriam L Diamond, Zhanyun Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna ShalinEmpa─Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, 9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Miriam L DiamondDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6296-6431
Zhanyun WangEmpa─Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, 9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9914-7659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmentally hazardous pharmaceuticals continue to be produced, used, and released to the environment, despite growing recognition of the need for greener drug design. This study applies a "lock-in" analytical framework to examine how various interacting social, economic, political, and technological factors prevent the effective implementation of concepts such as "benign by design" in drug development. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, including analysis of US and European clinical trial records, we identify two critical lock-ins: (1) misaligned timing of resources and expertise among key actors that prevents early integration of environmental safety and sustainability considerations in drug design, and (2) incentive structures that promote new drug development over the redesign of existing pharmaceuticals. Notably, this analysis identifies barriers to greening both future and existing drugs on the market. Building on Meadows' framework for effective interventions in complex systems, we propose a strategic approach for breaking lock-ins and present specific recommendations for key stakeholder groups including policymakers, academia, small biotech, big pharma, and financial institutions. Addressing these lock-ins is essential to unlocking the full potential of green innovation in pharmaceutical development, while providing for patient access to essential medicines.

Indexed as

PharmacyGreen Chemistry Technologybenign by designchemical lock-indrug developmentgreen chemistrysafe and sustainable by design

Identifiers

PMID41705836
PMCPMC12961740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.