Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41705768›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Current status of mathematical foundations of the Gestalt concepts in psychophysics.

Zygmunt Pizlo, Jie Z Wang, Barbara Dosher, Robert M Steinman

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zygmunt PizloDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jie Z WangCenter for Visual Science, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Barbara DosherDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Robert M SteinmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eileen Kowler was a member of the team of cognitive scientists that was assembled over a half a century ago by Robert M. Steinman. This team had grown and spanned several institutions in this country, as well as in Europe. The mechanisms governing the movements of the eyes were always at the center of Eileen's attention, but her research, as well as the research of our interdisciplinary group, is best understood by realizing its roots in Gestalt psychology. In the first part, this paper describes perspectives of two of the authors from the point of view of Eileen Kowler's collaborators. The second part provides a new look at the origins of Gestalt psychology, pointing out the scientific context of what has been referred to as the Gestalt revolution. The Gestalt revolution closely followed similar revolutions in mathematics and in physics, and it gave rise to new questions and challenges that have received recognition only recently.

Indexed as

Gestalt TheoryMathematicsPsychophysicsHistory, 20th CenturyHumans

Identifiers

PMID41705768
PMCPMC12924146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.