ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2026
Polygenic Risk for Cardiometabolic and Cardiovascular Disease in a Multiethnic Cohort of Breast Cancer Survivors.
Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk-guided cardioprotection in cardio-oncology.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Review
- Reply: Polygenic Risk Scores for Cardiovascular Disease in Breast Cancer Survivors: Implications for Asian Populations.JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Article
- Polygenic Risk Scores for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Breast Cancer Survivors: Implications for Asian Populations.JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Breast Cancer Survivors: Are Polygenic Scores Ready for Prime Time?JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBecause of cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicities, women with histories of breast cancer are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Many polygenic scores (PGS) have been developed for predicting risk for CVD-related conditions in the general population, but their performance in breast cancer patients remains largely unexplored.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to examine the performance of PGS for CVD-related traits to predict incident cardiometabolic disorder (CMD) and CVD in women with histories of breast cancer.
methodsIn a prospective multiethnic cohort of 3,620 breast cancer survivors, 27 PGS for CVD-related traits were we computed, and their associations with 12 incident CMD and CVD events were examined. The performance of these PGS was compared relative to clinical covariates-only models and by cardiotoxic cancer treatment.
resultsTwenty-three significant associations were identified after Bonferroni correction between PGS and CMD or CVD events in breast cancer patients. Although the model performance of PGS and multi-PGS added to or combined with clinical models for CMD and CVD risk prediction was numerically greater, these were not statistically significant. For some outcomes, PGS performed worse among patients who received cardiotoxic cancer treatments.
conclusionsAlthough there may be potential value of PGS in predicting the risk for CMD and CVD events in women with histories of breast cancer, current PGS performance is limited. This work highlights the need to develop de novo PGS in breast cancer patients and to include ancestrally diverse patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.