Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41705638›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical statistics

New, Shorter Small-Sample Intervals for Vaccine Efficacy.

Mauro Gasparini, Vincenzo Di Trani, Marco Ratta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mauro GaspariniDepartment of Mathematical Sciences "G.L. Lagrange", Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8011-4005
Vincenzo Di TraniDepartment of Mathematical Sciences "G.L. Lagrange", Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Marco RattaDepartment of Mathematical Sciences "G.L. Lagrange", Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-0614-5656

Funding

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca D34H-Digital Driven Diagnostics
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work we illustrate a method to improve estimation of Vaccine Efficacy (VE), a vastly employed measure of effect in vaccine clinical research, with small and medium sample sizes. We introduce a comprehensive Bayesian approach that improves upon existing methodologies, explicitly considering patient recruitment processes to inform parameter estimation. In particular-in contrast to most methods currently used-in our proposed methodology the total number of cases as well as the censored surveillance times are seen as informative statistics, with underlying distributions which are used to derive the full likelihood. It turns out that our model depends on first and second moments of the surveillance times regardless of the recruitment process and, for finite sample sizes, it improves on the maximum likelihood method, which depends only on the first moment. The methodology is validated through extensive numerical simulations, demonstrating substantial improvements in parameter interval estimation across diverse scenarios and under multiple recruitment plans, when the number of events-and roughly the sample sizes-are small to medium. For large sample sizes, our method is equivalent to maximum likelihood. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations are needed and can be conducted very efficiently, due to an appropriate parameterization.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalResearch DesignVaccine EfficacyVaccinesBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansLikelihood FunctionsMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodSample SizeVaccinesBayesian methodsincidence ratesmall‐sample asymptoticssurveillance times

Identifiers

PMID41705638
PMCPMC12914770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.