ArticleJournal of fish biology2026
Bayesian hierarchical stock-recruitment models for setting conservation limits for Atlantic salmon stocks in Scotland.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) populations in Scotland are subject to active management and conservation practices which require biological reference points (BRPs), specifically conservation limits, defined at the level of the stock. Acquiring the data necessary to independently derive these BRPs for all managed populations in Scotland is prohibitive, motivating the use of Bayesian hierarchical stock-recruitment models. These models provide a framework for the joint analysis of multiple monitored stocks, and the transportation of BRPs to non-monitored stocks. This framework was adapted to introduce nationally relevant and available covariates that might explain variation in recruitment dynamics among stocks and reduce uncertainty in posterior predictions of BRPs. Model selection was designed to maximise the prediction of BRPs for new stocks via leave-one-group-out cross-validation. Out-of-sample predictive performance was maximised by including information on latitude, land usage within the catchment and historic catch per area of salmon habitat in the model. The extensions to Bayesian hierarchical stock-recruitment methods presented here, when applied at a national scale, result in more locally discriminative posterior predictions compared to existing methods and are readily applicable to other stocks and species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.