Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41705391›Full record

ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026

Cell-in-Bead-in-Droplet Platform for pH-Based Microfluidic Screening of Ureolytic Bacteria.

Diego Giovanoli, Nadia Enrriquez, Anton Kan, Mathias Steinacher, Raphael Buess, Tomas Pena Müller, Stavros Stavrakis, Andrew deMello, André R Studart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Diego GiovanoliComplex Materials Department of Materials, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Nadia EnrriquezComplex Materials Department of Materials, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Anton KanComplex Materials Department of Materials, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Mathias SteinacherComplex Materials Department of Materials, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5906-7803
Raphael BuessComplex Materials Department of Materials, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Tomas Pena MüllerComplex Materials Department of Materials, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Stavros StavrakisInstitute For Chemical and Bioengineering Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andrew deMelloInstitute For Chemical and Bioengineering Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
André R StudartComplex Materials Department of Materials, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-8545

Funding

Board of the Swiss Federal Institutes of TechnologyETH Research GrantSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 200020_204614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureolytic microorganisms are central to microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP), a biotechnological process with applications in construction, environmental remediation, and wastewater treatment. Despite their potential, the discovery of robust, high-performing ureolytic strains is limited by the lack of assays that measure single-cell enzymatic activity in high-throughput platforms, such as droplet microfluidic devices. Although pH-based assays using urea offer a direct and label-free readout of urease activity, their implementation in droplet microfluidics is hindered by chemical crosstalk through diffusing molecules. Ammonia, the volatile product of ureolysis, spreads between droplets, making it difficult to detect droplets that host high-performing cells. To overcome this limitation, we have developed a 'cell-in-bead-in-droplet' (CiBiD) microfluidic platform that enables reliable detection of localized pH changes within individual cell-laden droplets. Single bacterial cells are first encapsulated in agarose beads to proliferate into microcolonies. The cell-laden beads are then re-encapsulated into droplets containing urea, a pH-sensitive fluorescent dye, and a buffer. By boosting the local enzymatic activity in the droplet while neutralizing diffusing ammonia with the buffer, the CiBiD approach circumvents diffusional crosstalk and enables robust detection of urease activity based on localized pH variations. Using a mock microbial consortium, our system achieved a 25-fold enrichment of active ureolytic strains after sorting 628 out of approximately 240,000 droplets in less than 30 min. To demonstrate its potential for the biopropection of functional microorganisms from natural microbiomes, the methodology was also successfully utilized to enrich ureolytic bacteria from environmental soil samples. Beyond local pH detection, the CiBiD concept may be applied to other challenging assays in media that operate at extreme pHs, involve high salt concentrations or are prone to undesirable dye interference. This makes CiBiD an attractive screening tool for high-throughput bioprospection and directed evolution of microorganisms.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidicsUreaHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationUreaseUreaUreasebioprospectionevolutionhigh‐throughput sortingmicrobially induced calcium carbonate precipitationmicroorganisms

Identifiers

PMID41705391
PMCPMC13089103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.