ArticleMycoses2026
Clinical and Mycological Profile of Dermatophyte Infections in South-East England: A 17-Year Retrospective Analysis (2006-2023).
Article in Mycoses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDermatophyte infections, which are among the most prevalent fungal infections globally, affect skin, hair and nails, accounting for significant morbidity. Epidemiological data on dermatophytosis in the UK are limited. One notable study in 2007 provided insights into the causative agents of dermatophyte infections in the UK; however, no extensive regional analysis has been published since.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to provide a contemporary understanding of the epidemiology and causative agents of dermatophytosis in South-East England.
methodThis retrospective laboratory database review analysed all samples of skin, hair and nail that underwent mycological examination (microscopy and culture) in a single diagnostic microbiology laboratory in South-East England over a period of 17 years (2006-2023).
resultsBetween 2006 and 2023, a total of 34,624 samples were collected, with the majority being nail (n = 26,362), followed by skin (n = 8015), hair (n = 246) and one unknown sample type. Fungal culture yielded positive results in 22.0% (n = 7601) of samples, with dermatophytes comprising 89.4% (n = 6794) and non-dermatophyte moulds 4.8% (n = 366). Trichophyton species dominated dermatophyte isolates at 99.3% (n = 6745), followed by Microsporum (0.5%, n = 37) and Epidermophyton (0.2%, n = 12). Onychomycosis of toenails was the most common infection (n = 2774), predominantly affecting males (median age: 48 years); the cause was Trichophyton rubrum in 80.5% of cases, and infection was confirmed by positive direct microscopy in 80.3%. Tinea pedis (n = 416), conversely, was more common in females (median age: 50 years). Other dermatophyte infections included tinea corporis (n = 179), onychomycosis of the fingernails (n = 99), tinea cruris (n = 91), tinea capitis (n = 82), tinea manuum (n = 56) and tinea faciei (n = 14). Trichophyton rubrum was the primary causative agent across all body sites except for tinea capitis, where Trichophyton mentagrophytes (30.5%), Trichophyton violaceum (19.5%) and Trichophyton tonsurans (15.9%) prevailed. Non-anthropophilic species (n = 165) caused infection across all body sites, but most caused tinea capitis (25.5%) and tinea corporis (20.0%) and affected younger individuals (median age: 29 years). Trichophyton mentagrophytes was the most common non-anthropophilic dermatophyte. Over the 17 years, the prevalence of Trichophyton interdigitale declined by 20%, while Trichophyton rubrum increased from 78.4% in 2006 to 82.0% in 2023. No cases of Trichophyton indotineae were identified.
conclusionThis study highlights the high prevalence of Trichophyton rubrum as a cause of dermatophyte infections in South-East England. Non-anthropophilic infections are rare and demographically distinct, guiding case management and public health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.