ArticlePrimary health care research & development2026
Experiences of self-identification, diagnosis and support for adults seeking a recognition of tic disorders in the United Kingdom.
Article in Primary health care research & development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study aimed to examine the experiences of self-identification, diagnosis, and support for adults with tic disorders (including Tourette Syndrome) in the United Kingdom (UK).
backgroundTraditionally viewed as a neurological disorder of childhood-onset, tic disorders have been observed to remit or persist, often in a milder form, into adulthood. However, the reappearance of problematic symptoms after periods of asymptomatic latency might be more common than previously recognized. The medical exposure and standardization of clinical practice for primary adult-onset or non-typical adult-presenting cases of tic disorders is currently limited and poses barriers to diagnosis.
methodsAn online survey of 42 adults with self-identified tic symptomology explored their tic recognition and journey of attaining a confirmed diagnosis and/or self-identifying after the age of 18 in the UK.
findingsNo significant differences were found between adult and childhood-onset cases. Elevated scores on the Acceptance and Action Tic Specific Questionnaire (AAQ-T) correlated with higher overall frequency, intensity, and severity of motor tics from the Adult Tic Questionnaire (ATQ). The AAQ-T was also shown to negatively correlate with increasing age. Nearly all adults expressed dissatisfaction with the diagnostic process, especially regarding information provided and lack of post-diagnostic support. Those who self-identified quoted fear of dismissal, long waiting lists and lack of understanding from clinicians as reasons for not seeking a formal diagnosis. Overall, the results emphasize the importance for a standardized improved comprehension of tic conditions in healthcare including how to best support adults seeking recognition later in life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.