Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41705346›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2026

Assessing psychological antecedents of vaccination in family health center visitors.

Cansu Özbaş, Merve Tokatlı Doğan, Fatma Nur Baran Aksakal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cansu ÖzbaşDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi Universityhttps://ror.org/054xkpr46, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7349-8063
Merve Tokatlı DoğanIstanbul Provincial Health Directorate: Istanbul Il Saglik Mudurlugu, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1847-3303
Fatma Nur Baran AksakalDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi Universityhttps://ror.org/054xkpr46, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study evaluates the psychological factors influencing vaccination attitudes and behaviors among individuals visiting family health centers. Using the 5C model, the study identifies key determinants affecting vaccination intention and hesitancy, providing insights into strategies to enhance vaccine acceptance.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 1712 adults aged 18 and over in Ankara, Turkey. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews, covering socio-demographic characteristics, vaccination attitudes, and internet usage. The Turkish version of the 'Psychological Antecedents of Vaccination (5C) Scale' was used to assess participants' responses. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors influencing vaccination intention.

resultsIndividuals whose income exceeds their expenses (OR: 1.532, 95% CI: 1.107-2.119), those who received the COVID-19 vaccine (OR: 2.362, 95% CI: 1.429-3.906), and those who are not active social media users (OR: 1.417, 95% CI: 1.096-1.833) were more likely to get vaccinated without hesitation. Higher

conclusionsThe findings suggest that fostering

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFamily HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTurkeyYoung Adult5C modeldecision-makingpublic healthvaccination intentionsvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID41705346
PMCPMC12931988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.