Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41705312›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics2026

Patient Perspectives on Psychiatric Polygenic Risk Scores in Reproductive Decision-Making and Polygenic Embryo Screening.

Lauren A Ginn, Amanda R Merner, Page M Trotter, Kaitlynn P Craig, Abigail C Martinez, Ana Lucía Battaglino, Dorit Barlevy, Daphne M Ayton, Takahiro Soda, Eric A Storch and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lauren A GinnCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-5548-9275
Amanda R MernerHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Page M TrotterCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Kaitlynn P CraigHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abigail C MartinezCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ana Lucía BattaglinoCenter for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dorit BarlevyCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Daphne M AytonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Takahiro SodaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6268-2965
Eric A StorchDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7631-3703
Gabriel Lázaro-MuñozHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Stacey PereiraCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6541-3904

Funding

Utilizing Community-Based Participatory Action Research Approaches to Inform Equitable OCD Genetics Research in Diverse PopulationsU01MH125062 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI STORCH, ERIC A. · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
Polygenic Risk Scores in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Ethical, Clinical, and Legal ImplicationsR01MH128676 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LAZARO-MUNOZ, GABRIEL, PEREIRA, STACEY · 2021 to 2024
$2.5M
International OCD FoundationNIH HHS R01MH128676NIH HHS U01MH125062NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128676NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH125062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) estimate individuals' genetic risk for developing multifactorial conditions. Recent genome-wide association studies have enabled development of psychiatric PRS, which hold potential to streamline diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric conditions. As individuals with mental illness often identify concern about passing on psychiatric conditions as a key factor in family planning, some may also seek to use psychiatric PRS in reproductive decisions like childbearing or embryo selection for in vitro fertilization. Despite calls for increased regulation, there remains no clinical consensus on the utility of psychiatric PRS in reproductive contexts. Therefore, we conducted semi-structured interviews of adults with psychiatric conditions (n = 29) to evaluate patient perspectives toward the tool's potential benefits and risks. Approximately half of participants would be interested in harnessing psychiatric PRS for reproductive purposes-including embryo screening and family planning-driven largely by desires to improve children's quality of life and seek empowerment while parenting. Others worried selecting against embryos with genetic risk for psychiatric disorders could exacerbate stigma. Regardless of personal stance, many noted using psychiatric PRS in reproductive decisions should be permissible for the general population. As psychiatric PRS continue to mature, patient views reported here can help inform their future in reproductive spaces.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMental DisordersMultifactorial InheritanceAdultFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic Risk ScoreGenetic TestingGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproductionethicsfamily planninggenetic testingpolygenic risk scorespsychiatryreproductive decisions

Identifiers

PMID41705312
PMCPMC13118807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.