ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2026
Emerging liquid biopsy tools to analyse cancer biomarkers: electrochemical sensors and extracellular vesicle analysis.
Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking barriers in peritoneal fibrosis: extracellular vesicles as promising diagnostic and therapeutic strategy.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Consolidated Evidence and New Frontiers of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review.Cells · 2026Review
- Theranostic Smart Bionanosensors for Solid Tumors: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Electrochemical liquid biopsy across cancer care pathway.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Better biomarker analysis technologies can provide improvements in the detection, characterisation and monitoring of cancer and less invasive sampling of blood and other body fluids can improve acceptability and affordability. Here, we discuss these technologies with a specific focus on recent advances in electrochemical sensors, specifically for the analysis of extracellular vesicles (EVs). Widely used biomarker tests with relatively high sensitivity (e.g. ELISAs) are limited by their cost, storage requirements and shelf-life, and ease of use away from centralised facilities. Moreover, their limits of detection (most commonly in the nanomolar to picomolar, with new technologies pushing into the femtomolar range) remain challenged by low abundance biomarkers. Here, we discuss how electrochemical sensor platforms, although often requiring more effort to adapt for new analytes, can provide high sensitivity and direct quantitation at low cost. These platforms are also often simpler to use away from testing facilities. Additionally, we explore how EVs, by protecting nucleic acid and protein cargos from degradation, may facilitate the collective enrichment from blood samples of multiple tumour-derived biomarkers. Continued progress in analysis technologies, alongside a deeper understanding of biomarker biology and clinical value, holds the potential to improve outcomes for the increasing numbers of individuals diagnosed with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.