Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41705184›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026

School stakeholders' perceptions of physical education teachers' core tasks-defining professional boundaries and increasing the relevancy of the subject.

Sharon Tsuk, Ronnie Lidor, Michal Arnon, Matan Narkis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sharon TsukThe Levinsky-Wingate Academic College, Netanya, Israel.
Ronnie LidorThe Levinsky-Wingate Academic College, Netanya, Israel.
Michal ArnonThe Levinsky-Wingate Academic College, Netanya, Israel.
Matan NarkisThe Levinsky-Wingate Academic College, Netanya, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding how different groups of relevant school stakeholders perceive the scope of physical education (PE) and its impact on children and youth can assist policymakers and teachers to increase PE's relevancy at the current time. Methods: In the current study, we explored the perceptions of 381 school stakeholders of one main pillar of PE-the core tasks of the PE teacher in elementary and high schools. Five groups of school stakeholders were identified: PE college students (future PE teachers), PE teachers, coaches, sport and physical activity policymakers, and parents of children in elementary and high schools. The stakeholders were given a questionnaire where a list of potential tasks of the PE teachers was introduced. They were then asked to select up to five most important tasks for (a) PE teachers who worked at elementary schools, and (b) PE teachers who worked at high schools. Results: The most important core tasks of the PE teacher as perceived by the school stakeholders across the groups were (a) encouraging a healthy and active lifestyle, (b) promoting engagement in physical activity, (c) teaching a variety of sport disciplines, (d) enhancing children's self-confidence, and (e) developing sport-specific skills. Conclusion: Overall, the school stakeholders perceived the PE teacher as a health promoter for involvement in physical activity. These perceptions should be considered by policymakers who aim to increase the relevance of PE to school children's everyday lives.

Indexed as

curriculumhealthpromotionrelevancesport pedagogytask classification

Identifiers

PMID41705184
PMCPMC12908945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.