Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41705111›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2025

Transformer-based human-motion forecasting coupled with safe reinforcement learning for telepresence robot co-navigation.

Heba G Mohamed, Muhammad Nasir Khan, Fawad Naseer, Muhammad Tahir, Mohsin Jamil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heba G MohamedDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad Nasir KhanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Fawad NaseerDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Beaconhouse International College, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad TahirDepartment of Computer Software Engineering, Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mohsin JamilDepartment of Engineering, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Telepresence robots (TPRs) must co-navigate with humans in constrained hospital environments, where safety depends on anticipating rather than merely reacting to human motion. Existing approaches rarely integrate short-horizon human-motion forecasting with safety-constrained control, which reduces robustness in dense corridors and ward bays. This study addresses this gap by evaluating an anticipatory, safety-aware co-navigation framework for TPRs. Methods: We developed a modular framework that couples a lightweight transformer-based forecaster that predicts multi-agent trajectories under occlusion with a safe reinforcement learning (RL) controller. The forecaster produces short-term distributions over pedestrian states that are embedded into the RL policy state and cost as risk-aware occupancy features. Safety is enforced via constrained policy optimization augmented by a run-time control barrier function (CBF) shield that filters unsafe actions. We benchmarked the approach against a social-force or dynamic window approach (DWA), an attention-based crowd-RL policy, and model predictive control (MPC) with CBF. Experiments were conducted across two hospital-like benchmarks (a crowded corridor and a four-bed ward), totaling 2,400 episodes. Outcomes included task success, collision count, minimum human-robot clearance, near-miss events ( ≤ 0.3 m), time-to-goal, CBF violations, and ablations removing forecasting and the CBF shield. Results: Relative to the best-performing baseline, the proposed method improved task success by 21.6% and reduced collisions by 47.3%. Median minimum human-robot clearance increased by 0.19 m, and near-miss events decreased by 38.5%. Time-to-goal was maintained within +2.7% of MPC+CBF while incurring zero CBF violations under the shield. Ablation studies showed that removing forecasting degraded success by 14.2%, whereas removing the CBF shield increased constraint breaches from 0% to 6.1% of steps. Discussion: Anticipatory perception combined with Safe-RL yields substantially safer and more reliable telepresence co-navigation in human-dense clinical layouts without sacrificing efficiency. The framework is modular, enabling alternative forecasters and safety shields. Limitations include sensitivity to forecast drift during abrupt changes in crowd flow. Future work will explore on-device adaptation, shared-autonomy overlays to incorporate operator intent, and prospective evaluations in live hospital workflows.

Indexed as

anticipatory perceptioncontrol barrier functions (CBF)crowd-aware navigationhealthcare environmentshuman–robot co-navigationsafe reinforcement learningtelepresence robots (TPRs)transformer-based motion forecasting

Identifiers

PMID41705111
PMCPMC12907402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.