Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41705102›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology

Primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of the urethra: a diagnostic conundrum - two case reports and literature review.

Elspeth Jamieson, Amit Goel, Nicola Lancaster, Amanda Clarke, Sanjeev Madaan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elspeth JamiesonDarent Valley Hospital, Darenth Wood Road, Dartford, DA2 8DA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4469-1542
Amit GoelMaidstone Hospital, Maidstone, UK.
Nicola LancasterDarent Valley Hospital, Dartford, UK.
Amanda ClarkeMaidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, UK.
Sanjeev MadaanDarent Valley Hospital, Dartford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4220-5613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary mucinous adenocarcinoma (PMAC) of the urethra is an exceptionally rare subtype of primary urethral carcinoma, with limited published data to guide diagnosis or treatment. Most literature consists of isolated case reports, and the non-specific presentation often delays diagnosis. This report presents two further cases and a review of the literature with a view to expand current understanding. We report two cases of PMAC. The first involves a 67-year-old male with progressive lower urinary tract symptoms initially treated as benign prostatic hyperplasia. Histology following a transurethral resection of the prostate revealed invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma with enteric features. He underwent radical prostatectomy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy for metastatic disease. The second case is a 52-year-old female with chronic urinary symptoms and a urethral mass initially misattributed to being from gynaecological origin. However, a biopsy later confirmed mucinous adenocarcinoma of the urethra. She underwent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, with partial response, but later developed further metastatic spread and is now undergoing palliative chemotherapy. PMAC is aggressive, often presents with non-specific urinary symptoms and lacks standardised diagnostic or treatment protocols. These cases highlight the importance of early detection through biopsies, immunohistochemical analysis and a multidisciplinary approach. Broader awareness and further reporting of cases are essential to develop evidence-based diagnostic and treatment guidelines for this rare malignancy.

Indexed as

mucinous adenocarcinomaprimary urethral carcinomaurethral adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41705102
PMCPMC12907476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.