ArticleThe International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc2026
Investigation of the Survival Time of Patients Who Underwent Endovascular Treatment Due to Type 3 Aortic Dissection and Factors Affecting This Duration.
Article in The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aortic dissection disguised as musculoskeletal condition: a case report and review of literature.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the survival time of patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic replacement (TEVAR) due to acute type 3 aortic dissection and to investigate comorbid conditions and dissection characteristics that affect survival time. Materials and Methods: Between 2013 and 2023, 94 patients who underwent TEVAR for type 3 dissection were retrospectively investigated. Survival time and factors affecting this time (comorbidity and dissection characteristics) were analyzed. Results: The most common comorbidities were hypertension (88%). There was no significant difference between the demographic data of surviving and deceased patients. During the follow-up period, 57% of the patients survived, and 43% of the patients died. The mean survival time after TEVAR was 20.1 (0-108) months among patients who died and 47.7 (2-120) months for patients who lived. The mean number of comorbidities was 2.13 in patients who died and 2.25 in patients who survived. Survival distribution according to the type of interventional procedure was 50% for partial closure of the subclavian artery, 38.1% for complete closure, and 66.2% for closure starting from the distal subclavian artery ( Conclusion: In our study, the survival rate was higher in patients who were followed regularly, and reintervention was applied when necessary. Therefore, we believe that undetected or untreated complications after TEVAR, rather than comorbid conditions, negatively affect survival more.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.