ArticleSexual medicine2026
Exploring the temporal relationship between psychosocial risk factors and recurrent ischemic priapism.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The development of recurrent ischemic priapism (RIP) is associated with mental health disorders, psychiatric medications, and substance use, but the temporal relationship between the onset of RIP and the development of these risk factors is poorly understood. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the chronology of psychosocial and substance use risk factors relative to the initial clinical presentation of RIP. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 73 adult patients diagnosed with RIP at a single academic center, identified via manual chart review of the electronic health record. Patients presenting with RIP between 2004 and 2020 were included, with data collection extending to 2025 to ensure a minimum follow-up of nearly 5 years for all participants to minimize censoring bias and capture delayed risk factor onset. Outcomes: The date of the first RIP presentation (index event) was compared to the first documented date of several risk factors, including anxiety, depression, psychiatric medication use, and substance use. Results: In the overall cohort, there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of any risk factor developing before versus after the onset of RIP. Further, in a sub-analysis of 35 patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), a higher proportion of patients initiated psychiatric medication after the onset of RIP, although this was not statistically significant ( Clinical implications: The findings suggest that RIP may be a psychologically traumatic event that contributes to the development of the same psychosocial risk factors it is associated with. Strengths and limitations: The primary strength of this study is its novel investigation into the temporal relationship between RIP and psychosocial risk factors, supported by a design that ensured a minimum follow-up period of over 4 years for all participants. Limitations are primarily related to its retrospective, single-center chart-review design. Conclusion: Our findings suggest a complex, potentially bidirectional relationship that highlights the need for integrated mental health screening for all patients with RIP, particularly for the high-risk SCD population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.