Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41705028›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026

Effects of additives in rehydrated corn silage with industrial tomato waste on intake, digestibility, ruminal parameters, and performance of feedlot-finished lambs.

Patrick Ferreira Cardoso, João Paulo Sampaio Rigueira, Vicente Ribeiro Rocha Júnior, Jade Passos de Almeida, Sérgio da Conceição Assunção, Fredson Vieira E Silva, Tiago Alves Corrêa Carvalho da Silva, Thais Oliva Neres, Jordânia Pereira da Silva, Ronnie Antunes de Assis and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Patrick Ferreira CardosoState University of Montes Claros, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, 2630, Janaúba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
João Paulo Sampaio RigueiraState University of Montes Claros, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, 2630, Janaúba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Vicente Ribeiro Rocha JúniorState University of Montes Claros, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, 2630, Janaúba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Jade Passos de AlmeidaState University of Montes Claros, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, 2630, Janaúba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Sérgio da Conceição AssunçãoState University of Montes Claros, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, 2630, Janaúba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Fredson Vieira E SilvaState University of Montes Claros, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, 2630, Janaúba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tiago Alves Corrêa Carvalho da SilvaUniversity of New England, School of Environmental and Rural Science, Elm Avenue, NSW, 2351 Armidale, Australia.
Thais Oliva NeresState University of Montes Claros, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, 2630, Janaúba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Jordânia Pereira da SilvaState University of Montes Claros, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, 2630, Janaúba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ronnie Antunes de AssisState University of Montes Claros, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, 2630, Janaúba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Flávio Pinto MonçãoState University of Montes Claros, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Avenue Reinaldo Viana, 2630, Janaúba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are doubts as to whether or not rehydrated corn silage with industrial tomato waste (ITW) requires additives. Thus, study aimed to evaluate the effects of different additives in rehydrated corn silage with ITW on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, ruminal parameters, nitrogen balance, ingestive behavior, and performance of feedlot-finished lambs. Twenty-four intact Dorper × Santa Inês crossbred male lambs, averaging 20.88 ± 1.84 kg of initial body weight and 100 days of age, were used. Four experimental diets were tested: (1) rehydrated corn silage with ITW and without additives; (2) rehydrated corn silage with ITW and a bacterial-enzymatic inoculant; (3) rehydrated corn silage with ITW plus 2% powdered sugarcane molasses; and (4) rehydrated corn silage with ITW including both a bacterial-enzymatic inoculant and 2% powdered sugarcane molasses, on a natural matter basis. The roughage-to-concentrate ratio was 50:50, based on dry matter (DM). The experiment followed a completely randomized design with four treatments and six replicates. No differences were observed among diets in dry matter intake (

Indexed as

Alternative feedingGrain-rich dietsIndustrial wasteOvis aries

Identifiers

PMID41705028
PMCPMC12908071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.