ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine safety in children under 7 years: a post-marketing analysis of the U.S. vaccine adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of adverse events following immunization with DTaP vaccine in children before and after immunization schedule adjustment.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Post-marketing safety surveillance of tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine: a disproportionality analysis of the vaccine adverse event reporting system (2015-2025).Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Although Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis (DTaP) vaccines have been used in the U.S. for decades and have extensive safety records, a comprehensive post-marketing assessment for all available types is still needed. This study leveraged the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database to evaluate adverse events following immunization (AEFI) and analyze potential associations with vaccine administration. Methods: We extracted all reports of adverse events (AEs) following DTaP vaccination from the VAERS database for the period 1990 to May 2025. Our analysis included descriptive statistics to summarize patient demographics and clinical features, and disproportionality methods to identify potential safety signals. Results: During the study period, the VAERS database documented 57,341 children under 7 years who received DTaP vaccines, corresponding to 57,368 administered doses and 193,955 adverse event (AE) reports. AE reporting was more frequent in males (52.46%) than females (45.07%), with more than half of the cases (50.44%) involving children under 2 years old. The most common clinical outcomes were recovery (62.53%) and hospitalization (10.29%). Most AEs (89.61%) occurred within 0-30 days after vaccination, with a median onset time of 1.0 days. Infanrix (37.95%) and Daptacel (25.04%) were the most frequently reported vaccine types. Disproportionality analysis detected 158 positive AE signals across 24 system organ classes (SOCs). Among all SAEs, pyrexia (ROR = 1.01) was the most frequently reported, followed by convulsion (ROR = 1.82) and vomiting (ROR = 1.05). The most common signals for non-SAEs included injection site erythema (ROR = 3.79), injection site swelling (ROR = 3.00), and erythema (ROR = 3.03). Conclusions: This post-marketing surveillance indicates that most reported AEs were non-serious and occurred within 30 days following vaccination. These findings support the known safety profile of DTaP vaccines and highlight identifiable timing patterns of AEs, which may help inform monitoring strategies and benefit-risk assessments after immunization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.