Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704950›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

Results of a remote audit program of reference and non-reference dosimetry of photon beams using alanine detectors.

Burak Yalvac, Nathalie Reulens, Brigitte Reniers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Burak YalvacUniversiteit Hasselt, CMK, NuTeC, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Nathalie ReulensUniversiteit Hasselt, CMK, NuTeC, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Brigitte ReniersUniversiteit Hasselt, CMK, NuTeC, Diepenbeek, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Remote beam output audits (BOAs) are important for verifying the calibration of the audited beam. However, BOAs (Level I audit) provide limited independent validation of the commissioned beam model in the treatment planning system (TPS). With Level II audits, the beam commissioning data is checked more thoroughly. This study presents the results of a remote audit program of reference and non-reference dosimetry, utilising alanine dosimetry. A particularity was to use the calculations of the TPS as reference values corrected by the daily output. The goal was to verify the beam commissioning data in the TPS, including the calibration. Materials and methods: The audit consisted of five irradiations with a 10 × 10 cm Results: The difference between the measured and predicted doses was within ±5 % for all beams except one. No clear trend was observed in the results for uniform and FFF beams. The uncertainty in the alanine readout was 1 % (k = 1). The results maintained their accuracy, while a slight improvement was observed in the small field test. Conclusions: All audit results were satisfactory. There is a slightly positive trend in the audit results over the years, suggesting that the accuracy of radiotherapy calculations is consistently maintained.

Indexed as

Alanine/EPR dosimetryBeam outputDosimetry auditQA

Identifiers

PMID41704950
PMCPMC12907101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.