Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704932›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Involuntary psychiatric treatment in Reggio Emilia: local findings from the SIEP multicenter study.

Luca Pingani, Giulia Dragani, Nadia Magnani, Mattia Marchi, Anna Maria Nasi, Fabrizio Starace, Gian Maria Galeazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luca PinganiDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Giulia DraganiDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Nadia MagnaniDepartment of Adult Mental Health, Grosseto Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Grosseto, Italy.
Mattia MarchiDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Anna Maria NasiDepartment of Mental Health and Pathological Addictions, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Fabrizio StaraceDepartment of Mental Health and Pathological Addictions (DSMDP), Azienda Sanitaria Locale TO5, Turin, Italy.
Gian Maria GaleazziDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Involuntary psychiatric treatment (IPT) remains a controversial practice, raising clinical, ethical, and organizational concerns. In Italy, despite legal safeguards, substantial variability persists across regions, reflecting differences in clinical presentation, service organization, and staff attitudes. As part of the national multicenter project promoted by the Italian Society of Psychiatric Epidemiology (SIEP), this study reports findings from the Reggio Emilia site, exploring factors associated with IPT duration, renewal, and the use of mechanical restraint. Methods: All adult patients admitted under IPT to the Psychiatric Diagnosis and Treatment Unit of Reggio Emilia between March 2023 and March 2024 were included (N = 214). Data were collected with standardized SIEP forms and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: The mean duration of IPT was 7.4 days (SD = 3.8). A history of prior IPT was strongly associated with renewal (37.7% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.001). First-ever contact and conversions from voluntary admission were not significant. Schizophrenia and delusional disorders were associated with longer hospitalizations (p < 0.01). Male patients were more often mechanically restrained (10.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.006), though duration did not differ by gender. Differences in IPT duration across validation settings were observed; however, Discussion: Overall, prior coercion history and organizational factors appeared to play a more prominent role than demographic characteristics in shaping IPT-related outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening community-based alternatives, early intervention strategies, and bias-aware staff training to reduce reliance on coercive practices.

Indexed as

coercioncommitment of mentally illhealth services researchinvoluntary psychiatric treatmentphysical restraintrecovery-oriented careschizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID41704932
PMCPMC12907820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.