ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Transgender identity and psychiatric care in Italian prisons: a thematic analysis of systemic gaps and institutional challenges.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals face high levels of stigma, discrimination, and psychological distress, which are amplified in carceral settings. Italian prisons have introduced specialized sections for TGD inmates; however, limited empirical evidence exists on their function and the psychiatric, social, and institutional challenges emerging within them. Methods: A case-informed qualitative design was applied to four TGD inmates housed in a specialized prison section in Northern Italy. Data were derived from routine psychiatric and endocrinological assessments, administrative documentation, informal and semi-structured interviews, and multidisciplinary team observations. A thematic cross-case synthesis was conducted to identify institutional determinants of distress and barriers to gender-affirming care. Results: Three themes emerged. (1) Context-dependent fluidity in gender identity recognition and categorization: institutional frameworks relied on static binary models, contributing to confusion and psychological strain. (2) Intra-group tensions within designated housing: discrepancies in transition pathways, administrative criteria, perceived authenticity, and the presence of sexual minority inmates generated conflict and social exclusion. (3) Gaps in gender-affirming and psychiatric care: logistical barriers, limited staff training, reliance on telemedicine, and inconsistent access to hormone therapy disrupted continuity of care and exacerbated distress. Discussion: These findings illustrate how rigid systems and ambiguous housing policies may reinforce minority stress and undermine psychiatric well-being. Protective units can inadvertently reproduce exclusion when gender identity and sexual orientation are conflated or when criteria for placement remain unclear. Correctional systems should adopt flexible gender-recognition procedures, implement trauma-informed practices, develop distinct housing policies, establish standardized pathways for gender-affirming care, and provide specialized staff training to ensure dignity, safety, and improved mental health outcomes for TGD inmates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.