ReviewTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025
Understanding Machine Learning Applications in Lung Transplantation: A Narrative Review.
Review in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation: A Temporal Classification and Machine Learning Clustering.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung transplantation (LTx) offers life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage lung disease but remains limited by donor shortages, complex postoperative management and graft failure. Machine learning (ML) enables opportunities to address these challenges by identifying patterns in complex, high-dimensional data, thereby providing novel insights and improving outcomes. This review outlines ML studies in LTx and explains the methodologies. ML has demonstrated promising results in organ allocation and outcome prediction. Techniques such as support vector machines, and deep learning are useful in risk stratification, while methods like random forests improve interpretability and transfer learning supports model development in data-scarce settings. ML has a growing role in multi-omics data and imaging-based diagnostics. Despite promising results, barriers such as small datasets, cross-center inconsistency, poor interpretability, and limited external validation, hinder clinical adoption. Future progress requires multicenter collaborations, transparent methodologies, and integration within clinical workflows. ML should serve as complementary tool that enhances decision-making, rather than replacing clinical judgement. With careful implementation, it holds the potential to improve transplant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.