ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
A health literacy intervention for registered nurses: Development and feasibility testing.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health literacy is essential for improving long-term health outcomes, enhancing quality of care, and ensuring patient safety in healthcare systems. Thus, supporting registered nurses in applying health literacy in practice is essential. While health literacy research is expanding, limited attention has been paid to how healthcare personnel develop health literacy sensitivity (i.e., knowledge, skills, and attitudes healthcare personnel require to effectively meet patients' health literacy needs). Objective: (1) Develop and assess the feasibility of a health literacy intervention for registered nurses working in a general hospital setting. (2) Explore potential changes in health literacy sensitivity, work-related factors, and mental well-being for registered nurses, following the intervention. (3) Evaluate registered nurses' experiences with implementing the intervention. Design: Pre-post feasibility study employing qualitative and quantitative approaches. Setting: Medical ward, general hospital. Participants: Methods: An advisory panel, Magnet4Europe's gap-analysis tool, and prior research were used to design the intervention. Health literacy sensitivity was measured using the Instrument of Health Literacy Competencies. Work-related factors and mental well-being were measured using four validated surveys. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive, non-parametric statistics. Registered nurses' experiences with implementing the intervention were assessed through individual and group interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: The final intervention included a dedicated health literacy nurse trained to motivate and guide colleagues in improving patients' health literacy. During a 6-month intervention period, registered nurses participated in internal health literacy education, project groups, morning briefings, and reflection groups. The intervention targeted all registered nurses ( Conclusion: Post-intervention measures demonstrated a significant increase in registered nurses' health literacy sensitivity through structured routines, interdisciplinary collaboration, access to resources, and support from a designated health literacy nurse. However, health literacy sensitivity remained a balance between rewarding engagement and burdensome responsibility. Trial Registration: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/935vj/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.