ArticleEndoscopy international open2026
Safety and efficacy of fully-covered self-expandable metal stent placement for refractory stomal stenosis.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Stomas, critical in managing various gastrointestinal conditions, can lead to complications like stomal stenosis, affecting 2% to 15% of patients and causing significant morbidity. Traditional treatments such as balloon dilation and surgical revisions often fail to provide lasting relief. This study investigated a novel, minimally invasive approach using fully-covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMSs) to address refractory stomal stenosis effectively. Patients and methods: Five patients with recurrent stomal strictures unresponsive to conventional treatments underwent stent placement. Etiologies included Crohn's disease, ischemia, and post-surgical fibrosis. Stents were selected based on stricture characteristics, ranging from 10 to 16 mm in diameter and 6 to 10 cm in length. Technical success was defined as successful deployment without immediate complication; clinical success was defined as sustained symptom resolution during follow-up. Outcome measures included abdominal girth, pain reduction (visual analog scale), vomiting, and dietary tolerance. Follow-up periods ranged from 8 weeks to 6 months. Results: All procedures were technically successful. Mean abdominal girth decreased from 114 ± 4.2 cm (range 108-119) to 103 ± 3.7 cm (range 99-108). Pain scores decreased from a mean of 8 ± 1.1 to 2 ± 1.2. Vomiting, bloating, and dietary tolerance improved in most patients. No stent migration or erosions/ulcer was observed during follow-up. Four patients had follow-up to 6 months without restenosis. One patient had restenosis with successful re-stenting within a 6-month follow-up period. Conclusions: FCSEMSs represent a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative for refractory stomal stenosis, with promising short-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.