ArticleEndoscopy international open2026
Neoplasia outcomes following colonoscopy for Lynch syndrome at a dedicated center vs. community centers.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: The European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends Lynch syndrome patients be followed in centers that monitor compliance and measure endoscopic performance. It is unclear if this policy impacts neoplasia outcomes. We investigated whether neoplasia outcomes were better at a dedicated center vs. community-based endoscopy centers. Patients and methods: We reviewed findings of surveillance colonoscopy in 129 Lynch patients according to whether the previous colonoscopy was performed at a community vs. dedicated center and compared detection rates of advanced lesions (cancers plus advanced precancerous lesions) at colonoscopy. Results: There were five cancers identified at a surveillance colonoscopy: one after a colonoscopy at the dedicated center at an interval of 137 months and four after community center colonoscopies at intervals of 12, 14, 26, and 77 months. Detection of advanced lesions (cancer plus advanced precancerous lesions) was higher after colonoscopy performed at community centers compared with the dedicated center (12.0% vs 4.1%; odds ratio [OR] 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-7.90). The cancer detection rate after previous colonoscopy at community centers was 4.3%, compared with 0.4% after colonoscopy at the dedicated center (OR 12.23; 95% CI 1.4-107.2). The interval between previous and surveillance colonoscopy was longer if the previous colonoscopy was performed at a community center (934 +/- 1037 days vs. 589 +/- 445 days; Conclusions: A dedicated center with consistently high colonoscopy performance measures and navigation to augment patient adherence provided superior neoplasia outcomes in Lynch syndrome patients compared with community colonoscopy centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.