Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704817›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Potential economy-wide impacts of an African swine fever outbreak in the United States.

Tais C de Menezes, Amanda M Countryman, Dustin L Pendell, Jonathan Rushton, Jimmy Tickel, Heather Simmons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tais C de MenezesDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Amanda M CountrymanDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Dustin L PendellDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Jonathan RushtonThe Global Burden of Animal Diseases Programme, The Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Jimmy TickelInstitute for Infectious Animal Diseases, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Heather SimmonsInstitute for Infectious Animal Diseases, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: African swine fever (ASF) poses a major threat to the U.S. pork sector, with potentially large spillovers through domestic markets and international trade. To inform preparedness and policy design, we quantify the economy-wide consequences of a hypothetical ASF outbreak under alternative scenarios of production losses and export restrictions. Methods: We use a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to simulate four hypothetical ASF scenarios that vary by outbreak size and export restrictions. The model endogenously captures adjustments in production, prices, bilateral trade flows, and welfare, and we assess robustness using systematic sensitivity analysis. Results: Small outbreak scenarios generate limited sectoral disruption and no substantial GDP effects, with U.S. welfare losses of $310-$563 million. Large outbreak scenarios reduce U.S. hog production by 7.34%-8.57% and pork production by 7.25%-10.8%, increase U.S. hog producer prices by 41.6%-41.8% and pork prices by 6.5%, and reduce U.S. GDP by 0.05%. Corresponding U.S. welfare losses rise to $10.9-$11.4 billion. Globally, large outbreaks increase world hog and pork prices by 3.67%-3.69% and 1.20%-1.22%, respectively, and drive trade diversion toward alternative exporters. Discussion: The results indicate that the economic costs of ASF increase substantially with outbreak size and are shaped by the severity of trade restrictions. Investments that prevent escalation (early detection, rapid containment) and strategies that preserve market access (credible regionalization/zoning arrangements) can substantially reduce welfare losses and global market disruption.

Indexed as

African swine feveragricultural trade disruptionscomputable general equilibrium modellivestock disease impactsU.S. pork industry

Identifiers

PMID41704817
PMCPMC12908596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.