Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704814›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026

From machine learning to digital twin integration for livestock production and research.

Mohamed Abdelrahman, Sali Issa, Montaser Elsayed Ali, Jamal Alotaibi, Fahad Alshanbari

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed AbdelrahmanAnimal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Assuit University, Asyut, Egypt.
Sali IssaDepartment of Electrical Information of Science and Technology, Hubei University of Education, Wuhan, China.
Montaser Elsayed AliDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt.
Jamal AlotaibiDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Computer, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad AlshanbariDepartment of Medical Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, climate change, economic crises, and increased food demand pose significant challenges to the stability of agricultural production systems, underscoring the urgent need for more innovative approaches and tools to advance livestock production science. Machine Learning (ML) development supported the Digital Twin (DT), a digital replica of a real-world entity, as a game-changer in modern livestock science, enabling the prediction, optimisation, and simulation across various research environments. At the same time, it has been shown that synergism between ML and Digital Twin (DT) can mimic animals' physiological and physical state and behavior based on input data, leading to a better understanding of animal behavior, nutritional requirements, physiological status, or environmental stressors to investigate responses and suggest precise decisions. Moreover, such animal simulation models can offer deeper insights and predictive analytical tools that support animal welfare, forecast production efficiency, and sustainability. Although traditional simulation models are mainly snapshot-state models that indicate what should happen on average, ML-DT integration serves as a living mirror, dynamically predicting what is happening right now and what will happen to each animal under various changes. This integration can be a versatile tool for introducing solutions in the research domain; however, its augmentation remains complex and poses significant ethical, economic, and governance challenges. This review discusses recent ML-DT synergism applications in both barns and labs, highlighting their potential to reform both industry and research.

Indexed as

animal behavior analysiscaredigital twinhealthlivestock productionMachine Learningpredictive analytics

Identifiers

PMID41704814
PMCPMC12908607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.