Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704789›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

Engineering the plant microbiome: synthetic community approaches to enhance crop protection.

Ketankumar Panchal, Ankit Sudhir, Anil S Prajapati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ketankumar PanchalDepartment of Biological Sciences, P. D. Patel Institute of Applied Sciences, Charotar University of Science and Technology, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Ankit SudhirDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Sciences, GSFC University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Anil S PrajapatiM. B. Patel Science College, Anand, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plant microbiome is essential for plant health; in particular, synthetic microbial communities (SynComs) offer a scalable, sustainable alternative to chemical pesticides. The concept has moved beyond single-strain inoculants, with SynComs being rationally designed using ecological principles, computational tools, and an understanding of how plants shape their microbial niche through root exudates and chemotaxis. Indeed, effective SynCom design requires a mechanistic understanding of microbe-microbe and host-microbe interactions. In real field settings, SynComs have been shown to suppress diseases in tomato, rice, wheat, and maize while enhancing yield. Inconsistent field performance, instability in formulation, regulatory challenges, and farmer adoption are among the pressing issues related to SynComs. In the foreseeable future, the integration of machine learning and gene-editing tools is expected to enable SynCom formulation with greater precision and impact. Favorable labor division and mutualistic relationships within a SynCom make it a more controlled and ecologically informed tool for modern agriculture.

Indexed as

crop immunitydisease resiliencemicrobiome engineeringplant microbiomerhizosphere microbiotasustainable agriculturesynthetic microbial communities

Identifiers

PMID41704789
PMCPMC12907444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.