ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2026
A prospective cohort study of ultra-rush subcutaneous immunotherapy in dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety and Tolerability of Accelerated Venom Immunotherapy with Depot Extracts in Insect-Venom-Allergic Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent disease with a considerable global burden. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) represents the cornerstone causal treatment for AR. While accelerated schedules such as Cluster Subsutaneous Immunotherapy (Cluster SCIT) shorten the initial buildup phase than Conventional treatment, the even more rapid Ultra-Rush Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (UR-SCIT) lacks a head-to-head, prospective comparison regarding its efficacy and safety. Methods: A total of 57 patients with house dust mite induced AR were included in this study and followed up for 12 months. Allocation to the 2 treatment groups (UR-SCIT and Cluster SCIT) was based on patient preference. Treatment efficacy was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS). Additionally, skin prick test (SPT), nasal allergen challenge (NAC), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and fractional nasal nitric oxide (FnNO) were measured at baseline (M0) and at the 12-month follow-up (M12). Eosinophils (EOS) and eosinophil percentage (EOS%) in blood、serum levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-33, total IgE, dust mite-specific IgE (sIgE), dust mite-specific IgG4 (sIgG4),the ratio of sIgG4/sIgE and sIgE/tIgE were detected at months 0, 6, and 12. To evaluate safety, local and systemic adverse reactions were recorded during the treatment period. Results: In this study, both UR-SCIT and Cluster SCIT groups showed significant reductions in VAS, CSMS, RQLQ and TNSS scores at M12, alongside decreases in SPT grade. Immunological analysis revealed that both groups exhibited reduced levels of EOS, EOS%, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and IL-33, while IL-10 levels increased. Changes in EOS count and EOS% levels were correlated with improvements in AR symptoms. SIgG4 levels rose in both groups, but tIgE、sIgE and sIgE/tIgE ratios showed no significant changes. Adverse reaction incidence was similar in both groups, with no serious events reported. Conclusion: UR-SCIT achieves therapeutic efficacy comparable to Cluster SCIT, with both demonstrating robust symptom control and favorable immunological changes. The similar safety profiles, with no serious adverse events indicate that UR-SCIT is a viable new option for AIT in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.