Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704773›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Decoding P300 as a shared neural mechanism for oddball target detection and working memory updating.

Weixing Yang, Shuoqi Xiang, Bijuan Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weixing YangFaculty of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Shuoqi XiangSchool of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Bijuan HuangSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, No. 336, West Nanxinzhuang Road, Shizhong District, Jinan City, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The P300 is a well-established neurophysiological component that has been extensively investigated within the oddball paradigm and is commonly interpreted as reflecting context or working memory (WM) updating. This interpretation implies that the P300 elicited by oddball target detection shares neural mechanisms with the P300 elicited by WM. To test this hypothesis, we applied multivariate pattern analysis to perform cross-task decoding between EEG patterns during an oddball task and an n-back task, a classical WM paradigm. We found that classifiers trained on EEG patterns from the oddball task successfully decoded those from the n-back task, and vice versa, with the effect concentrated in the parietal/occipital region within the P300 time window. These findings suggest that the P300 serves as a shared neural mechanism for oddball target detection and WM updating, supporting the WM updating account of the P300 from the perspective of neural representation.

Indexed as

Biocomputational methodCognitive neuroscienceSystems neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID41704773
PMCPMC12907112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.