Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704702›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Automated tumor regression grade assessment and survival prediction in esophageal cancer via weakly supervised multiple instance learning.

Zhengjin Liu, Lin Zhao, Ziqing Zhao, Wenjuan Qin, Jun Zhong, Fenglian Lin, Meizhen Lu, Ruixiang Guo, Qunhuang Guo, Hui Xu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhengjin Liu *Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Lin Zhao *Department of Computer Science at School of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Ziqing Zhao *Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Wenjuan Qin *Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Jun Zhong *Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Fenglian LinDepartment of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Meizhen LuDepartment of Health Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Ruixiang GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Qunhuang GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Hui XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Shouguo LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Hao ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Haijie LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Esophageal cancer remains a major global health burden and is among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. Accurate evaluation of tumor regression grade (TRG) after neoadjuvant therapy is essential for assessing treatment response and guiding postoperative management. However, conventional TRG assessment relies heavily on subjective histopathological assessments, leading to considerable inter-observer variability and limited reproducibility. We aimed to develop an objective and automated TRG assessment framework using artificial intelligence for digital pathology. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 157 patients with esophageal cancer and 1,298 hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images. Three slide-level pathology foundation models and three multiple instance learning methods were evaluated within a patient-level multiple instance learning framework, enabling weakly supervised TRG prediction based solely on patient-level labels. Results: The proposed framework achieved a classification accuracy of 82.7% and demonstrated strong agreement with manual pathologist grading. Notably, artificial intelligence-derived TRG score provided superior prognostic stratification compared with conventional assessments, showing significant associations with progression-free and overall survival. Discussion: This study presents a foundation-model-driven, patient-level multiple instance learning framework for automated evaluation of TRG in esophageal cancer. This approach offers a standardized, reproducible, and clinically interpretable solution that reduces the workload of pathologists and improves prognostic precision. These findings highlight the potential of weakly supervised AI pathology in advancing personalized treatment assessment and decision-making in digital oncology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemultiple instance learningneoadjuvant therapypathology foundation modeltumor regression grade

Identifiers

PMID41704702
PMCPMC12907208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.