ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Automated tumor regression grade assessment and survival prediction in esophageal cancer via weakly supervised multiple instance learning.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Esophageal cancer remains a major global health burden and is among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. Accurate evaluation of tumor regression grade (TRG) after neoadjuvant therapy is essential for assessing treatment response and guiding postoperative management. However, conventional TRG assessment relies heavily on subjective histopathological assessments, leading to considerable inter-observer variability and limited reproducibility. We aimed to develop an objective and automated TRG assessment framework using artificial intelligence for digital pathology. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 157 patients with esophageal cancer and 1,298 hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images. Three slide-level pathology foundation models and three multiple instance learning methods were evaluated within a patient-level multiple instance learning framework, enabling weakly supervised TRG prediction based solely on patient-level labels. Results: The proposed framework achieved a classification accuracy of 82.7% and demonstrated strong agreement with manual pathologist grading. Notably, artificial intelligence-derived TRG score provided superior prognostic stratification compared with conventional assessments, showing significant associations with progression-free and overall survival. Discussion: This study presents a foundation-model-driven, patient-level multiple instance learning framework for automated evaluation of TRG in esophageal cancer. This approach offers a standardized, reproducible, and clinically interpretable solution that reduces the workload of pathologists and improves prognostic precision. These findings highlight the potential of weakly supervised AI pathology in advancing personalized treatment assessment and decision-making in digital oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.