ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2026
The association between cognitive function trajectories and all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older Chinese adults with cardiovascular disease: A longitudinal study from CHARLS.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Reply to the comment on "the association between cognitive function trajectories and all-cause mortality in Middle-aged and older Chinese adults with cardiovascular disease: A longitudinal study from CHARLS".International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Comment on "The association between cognitive function trajectories and all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older Chinese adults with cardiovascular disease: A longitudinal study from CHARLS".International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Comment on "The association between cognitive function trajectories and all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older Chinese adults with cardiovascular disease: A longitudinal study from CHARLS".International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify distinct multi-year cognitive function trajectories in middle-aged and older Chinese adults with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) and evaluate their independent associations with all-cause mortality. Methods: This prospective study utilized data from five waves (2011-2020) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). A total of 1464 participants aged ≥45 years with CVD were included. Global cognitive scores (range 0-21) were assessed at three time points (2011, 2013, and 2015). A Longitudinal K-means clustering algorithm with Dynamic Time Warping was employed to identify cognitive trajectories. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality during a mean follow-up of 4.7 years. Results: Four distinct cognitive trajectories were identified: High-Baseline-Relatively-Stable (39.1 %), Mid-High-Baseline-Significant-Improvement (31.2 %), Mid-Baseline-Rapid-Decline (16.7 %), and Low-Baseline-Relatively-Stable (13.0 %). Using the Mid-High-Baseline-Significant-Improvement group as the reference, both the Mid-Baseline-Rapid-Decline trajectory (adjusted HR = 2.01; 95 % CI: 1.32-3.05) and the Low-Baseline-Relatively-Stable trajectory (adjusted HR = 1.82; 95 % CI: 1.10-3.00) were significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality after adjusting for covariates. The association was notably stronger among participants with hypertension (P for interaction = 0.009). Conclusions: Among middle-aged and older adults with CVD, trajectories characterized by rapid cognitive decline or persistently low function are powerful, independent predictors of all-cause mortality. In contrast, cognitive improvement is not associated with excess mortality risk. These findings underscore the prognostic importance of dynamic cognitive assessment and suggest that monitoring cognitive trajectories may aid in the risk stratification of CVD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.