Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704665›Full record

ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2026

Goal Setting According to Level of Mobility Independence in Home-Visit Rehabilitation Using Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.

Rie Narukawa, Eri Otaka, Kenji Sato, Takeshi Kamiya, Sayo Kawamura, Taku Iwase, Masaki Kamiya, Daiki Shimotori, Hitoshi Kagaya

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rie NarukawaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Eri OtakaLaboratory of Practical Technology in Community, Assistive Robot Center, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Kenji SatoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Takeshi KamiyaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Sayo KawamuraDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Taku IwaseDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Masaki KamiyaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Daiki ShimotoriLaboratory of Practical Technology in Community, Assistive Robot Center, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Hitoshi KagayaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to clarify the differences in goal setting and achievement trends in home-visit rehabilitation at different levels of independence in mobility. Methods: Goals set at the beginning of home-visit rehabilitation were retrospectively examined using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). All goals were classified into nine categories in three domains based on the principles of the COPM. The participants were divided into three groups according to their level of independence in mobility. The proportion of participants with goals in each category was compared. Additionally, the COPM performance and satisfaction scores at the beginning of rehabilitation and 3 months later were compared. Results: In total, 245 participants were categorized into the assisted (n=48), supervised (n=65), and independent groups (n=132). Functional mobility (36.3%) was the most common goal, accounting for the largest number of patients within each group. The percentages of those with goals in the categories of personal care (P Conclusions: Goal categories for home-visit rehabilitation varied according to the level of independence in mobility. Nevertheless, goals in the self-care domain are likely to be achieved, regardless of mobility independence, after home-visit rehabilitation.

Indexed as

activities of daily livingfunctional mobilityhome-based rehabilitationsatisfactionself-perceived performance

Identifiers

PMID41704665
PMCPMC12907186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.