Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704655›Full record

ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2026

Estimation of the exponential growth rate of an epidemic.

Manting Wang, P van den Driessche, Laura L E Cowen, Junling Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manting WangDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
P van den DriesscheDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Laura L E CowenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Junling MaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the initial growth rate of an epidemic is critical for assessing transmissibility and guiding early interventions. Standard regression-based methods, such as negative binomial regression, often rely on independence assumptions that may underestimate uncertainty. We propose a hidden Markov model (HMM) framework that explicitly accounts for the unobserved infectious population. Using data generated from a stochastic linear SEIR model, we compare the performance of different methods for estimating the exponential growth rate. Our results show that HMMs yield more robust and reliable estimates than negative binomial regression, with improved coverage probabilities of the 95 % credible intervals. In particular, modelling the infectious population with a negative binomial distribution (with a constant probability parameter) or a binomial distribution provides more accurate inference than the other methods considered. Moreover, this framework is extended beyond the exponential phase by combining it with a logistic model to account for the slowing down of the exponential growth due to the depleting of the susceptible population. We apply this extended method to data on the early stage of COVID-19 pandemic in Africa and Ontario, Canada to estimate the initial growth rate, and we demonstrate that the HMM-logistic framework improves stability and reliability of estimates.

Indexed as

Coverage probabilityHidden Markov modelInfectious diseaseNegative binomial regression modelParameter estimation

Identifiers

PMID41704655
PMCPMC12908057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.