ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2026
The assessment and management of acute trauma pain in a Cape Town, South Africa Emergency Centre: A retrospective chart review.
Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute pain and analgesic prescribing in trauma inpatients at a tertiary hospital: A cross-sectional study.Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trauma accounts for over 60,000 deaths annually in South Africa and is also responsible for a high proportion of emergency centre (EC) visits. Up to 91% of trauma patients in the EC experience acute pain, underscoring a critical public health concern, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMICS), where research indicates poor pain management and a paucity of data. This study aimed to describe trauma pain assessment and management practices in a busy Cape Town EC. Methods: This single-centre retrospective chart review in a high trauma burden EC collected a convenience sample over two weeks in 2024. Data were extracted from the medical records of adult trauma patients presenting to the EC. Results: A total of 234 patients were included, predominantly male (73.1%), with a median age of 33 (IQR 26-41). Only 32.9% (77) of the patients had their pain assessed and documented, largely only in the triage process, and no patient had their pain reassessed. Furthermore, only 42.3% (99) of patients received analgesia, including opioids administered to 48.5% (48), non-steroidal anti-inflammatories to 45.5% (45), paracetamol to 69.7% (69), and ketamine to 17.2% (17). The time from arrival to the administration of the first analgesia in the EC was documented in 83 patients, with a median time to analgesia of 375 min (IQR 152-611). Conclusion: This study demonstrates findings consistent with the global crisis of inadequate pain management. It reveals poor pain assessment and management, with prolonged waiting times for analgesia despite various indicators of potential pain severity, highlighting a crucial need for changes in pain management strategies. Training, awareness, and protocols to improve pain management are essential, along with considering nurse-led analgesia at triage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.