Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704617›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Validation of Chinese medicine syndrome differentiation in early breast cancer: a multicenter prospective clinical study.

Wei Luo, Yan Dai, Jiahua Wu, Xiaohong Xue, Lifang Liu, Weihe Bian, Xiaohong Xie, Gang Lyu, Ri Hong, Chang Qiu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Wei Luo *State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome/Breast Disease Specialist Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yan Dai *Breast Disease Specialist Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiahua WuBreast Disease Specialist Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaohong XueDepartment of Mammary, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lifang LiuDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Weihe BianDepartment of Breast Diseases, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaohong XieDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Gang LyuDepartment of Breast, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing, Sichuan, China.
Ri HongBreast Department, Sanya Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Sanya, Hainan, China.
Chang QiuBreast Disease Specialist Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaojie LinBreast Disease Specialist Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Rui XuBreast Disease Specialist Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qianqian GuoBreast Disease Specialist Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qianjun ChenState Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome/Breast Disease Specialist Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. Chinese herbal medicine, which is based on accurate Chinese medicine (CM) syndrome diagnosis, plays a vital role during cancer treatment. This study aimed to validate the established CM syndrome diagnostic criteria for early breast cancer, enhancing their application in clinical settings. Methods: A multicenter prospective clinical study was conducted to collect epidemiological data on CM syndromes. Two attending doctors from the CM breast department performed syndrome differentiation using established diagnostic criteria and compared it to two clinical experts with associate senior professional titles. Metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were utilized to assess the validity of the diagnostic test. Results: A total of 641 eligible cases were enrolled from June 2022 to October 2023 from seven hospitals in China. The sensitivity rates for all syndromes ranged from 70.37% to 92.00%, with the highest rate for Spleen and Stomach disharmony in the postoperative stage. Specificity varied from 86.84% to 98.89%, with most criteria exceeding 90%. Overall accuracy of the diagnostic criteria was between 84.25% and 94.45%. Positive predictive values ranged from 72.22% to 98.21%, while negative predictive values spanned from 79.25% to 98.82%, with most syndromes above 80%. The concordance rate for diagnostic criteria ranged from 90.91% to 96.45%, with Kappa values between 0.747 and 0.926. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the diagnostic criteria exhibit high reliability, confirming the validity of CM syndrome diagnostic criteria among different treatment stages for early breast cancer and contributing to standardizing clinical practice.

Indexed as

Chinese medicine syndromediagnostic criteriaearly breast cancermulticenter clinical studystandardization of clinical practice

Identifiers

PMID41704617
PMCPMC12907149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.