ArticleAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research
The influence of ocular parameters on intraocular pressure values measured by different devices and the development of an optimized prediction model in a myopic population.
Article in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the associations between ocular parameters-mean keratometry (Km), spherical equivalent (SE), central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length (AL), corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF)-and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by non-contact tonometry (IOP Methods: This study included 64 patients (128 eyes). All participants underwent comprehensive ocular examinations (CCT, AL, SE, Km, CH, and CRF) and IOP measurements using multiple tonometers. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were employed to identify key influencers on IOP readings. An optimized prediction model was subsequently developed using NCT, CCT, CH, and CRF as independent variables, and its goodness-of-fit was evaluated. Results: Age, AL, Km, IOP Conclusions: DCT measurements were less influenced by CCT, CH, and CRF, supporting their potential reliability for IOP assessment in patients with myopia. The optimized prediction model based on multiple regression analysis was able to predict DCT values to some extent, thereby reducing the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on IOP measurement. However, the model requires further validation and refinement in studies with larger sample sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.