Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704543›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

ORCH: many analyses, one merge-a deterministic multi-agent orchestrator for discrete-choice reasoning with EMA-guided routing.

Hanlin Zhou, Huah Yong Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanlin ZhouSchool of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Malaysia.
Huah Yong ChanSchool of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Multi-agent/ensemble approaches can improve discrete-choice reasoning with large language models, but common orchestration methods are often non-deterministic, expensive, and difficult to reproduce. We propose ORCH, a deterministic multi-agent orchestrator that targets higher accuracy and better cost-performance via stable routing. Methods: ORCH uses a pool of heterogeneous LLM agents and a deterministic routing mechanism based on exponential moving average (EMA) performance tracking. For each question, ORCH selects a small subset of agents, obtains candidate answers, and merges them through a controlled aggregation procedure. We evaluate ORCH on multiple discrete-choice benchmarks and compare against single-model baselines and non-routed ensemble strategies under consistent prompting and scoring. Results: ORCH delivers consistent accuracy improvements over the best low-cost single model and provides additional gains over high-cost single-model baselines on several tasks, while reducing reliance on always-invoking expensive models. The deterministic routing and merge pipeline improves stability across runs. Discussion: ORCH demonstrates that deterministic EMA-guided routing can offer a practical and reproducible orchestration strategy for discrete-choice reasoning. This framework can be extended to additional tasks, agent pools, and preference-aware routing policies in future work.

Indexed as

agent routingcollaborative reasoningdiscrete-choice reasoningexponential moving averagelarge language modelsmodel ensemblemulti-agent systems

Identifiers

PMID41704543
PMCPMC12907423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.