ArticleData in brief2026
Multimodal FM-SEM dataset with millimetre-scale field of view for bundle-scale porosity and impregnation quantification in woven GFRP/PP composites.
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A curated multimodal microscopy dataset is presented for statistical quantification of through-thickness, bundle-scale impregnation and porosity-defined as non-filled regions within bundle cross-sections-in woven glass-fibre/polypropylene (GF/PP) laminates. The dataset spans three controlled compaction ratios (Cr = 0 %, 30 %, 41 %), providing a structured basis for investigating processing-microstructure relationships in thermoplastic composites and addressing limitations of 2D single-modality analyses of partially impregnated materials. Large-area cross-sections were prepared post-processing using a fluorescence-enriched epoxy mount and a multi-step polishing protocol tailored to partially impregnated thermoplastics, then imaged by fluorescence microscopy (FM), polarized light microscopy (PLM) and backscattered-electron scanning electron microscopy (SEM-BSE). Overlapping tiles were stitched into millimetre-scale extended-field images that still resolve individual filaments and were rigidly registered to form aligned FM/PLM/SEM stacks across the full laminate thickness. Detailed procedures for sample manufacturing, surface preparation, polishing and quantitative analysis are provided in a companion research article by the same authors [1]. The core quantitative products are extended-field FM and SEM images with associated five-class Random Forest segmentation maps, trained on image-derived intensity features to distinguish phase- and porosity-related classes (including glass fibres, matrix and void-rich regions), while PLM primarily documents surface state and polishing quality. For bundle-scale analysis, >15 complete fibre bundles oriented perpendicularly to the polishing plane (0°-oriented) are extracted and systematically labelled per extended-filed image. For each bundle, the dataset provides paired FM/SEM crops, corresponding segmented images, and binary masks for void-limited masks, bundle outlines and the glass-fibre phase. The companion research article reports per-bundle quantitative metrics, whereas the present data paper describes the dataset structure and known limitations, including large image sizes, residual SEM brightness drift, exclusion of bundles with pronounced stitching artefacts, and the non-linear response of dye infiltration to porosity. The full dataset, including raw and processed image products, is available in the public repository
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.